AIMS

Response to Baruch: We Weren't Seeking Canonization, Just a Hearing

Vol. 5, 2002, n°1, p 23-29
Hugh P. Gunz, Allan Bird, Michael B. Arthur

We respond to the points raised by Baruch in his critique of our introduction. We believe the critique is helpful because it directs our attention to some important questions that need addressing when applying ideas from one branch of science to another. We argue that there is value in looking elsewhere for ideas, provided that it is done carefully and with rigour.

Accepted by : Guest Editors Allan Bird, Hugh P. Gunz, and Michael B. Arthur

Voir le document complet sur le site management-aims.com >